Persistent tension between Hungary and its Western allies has become a defining feature of European politics. Hungary has found itself in the crossfire of numerous international criticisms in recent years. The accusations span a wide spectrum: from the state of the rule of law, through restricting the operating space of civil organizations, to fostering relations with Russia and China. In the context of NATO, energy policy and ties with Russia frequently provoke sharp criticism.

On the other hand, the Hungarian government tries to justify its position by claiming that there is nothing at the centre of its actions other than a merely pragmatic approach: the preservation of Hungarian sovereignty, the preservation of foreign policy space, constructive reaction to the shifting power balance in the world, and the exploitation of economic benefits.

However, recent events have given rise to an interesting development. Hungary’s approach to governance and international relations increasingly anticipates a shift in Western political thinking. Hungarian exceptionalism, once considered controversial, is now more and more a template for political movements across Europe. Once seen as controversial, Hungary’s strong devotion to what it calls ‘common-sense politics’—stated in its ‘No War, No Migration, No Gender’ stance—has started to become more common in Western political discourse.

Hungary at the Crossroads — Geopolitical Legacy and Modern Identity

The Strategic Heritage of the Carpathian Basin

For Hungary, its geographical location—right in the heart of the Carpathian Basin—has always been and still is of great importance. Located at the crossroads of Eastern and Western cultures, the Carpathian Basin has been of great strategic value to neighbouring states or empires over its long history. Due to the region’s status as a natural meeting point between different parts of Europe, Hungary could not stay neutral in major regional conflicts.

The convergence of mountain passes, rivers, and plains in the Carpathian Basin meant that any major European power seeking to project force across the continent needed to either control or neutralize this territory. The geography of this region has driven Hungary into sophisticated political and diplomatic interactions with neighbouring powers, frequently demanding tough decisions between conformity (or alignment) and opposition.

Hungary’s Dual Identity — Balancing East and West

The history of Hungary has been characterized by a continuous tightrope walk between major powers, particularly during the last five centuries since the country’s division into three parts in 1541. However, this two-fold attitude has been present in the national conscience since Hungary’s era in the Carpathian Basin, when it stood bridging two cultures with one foot in Asia and the other in Europe. The Hungarian society embodies a special link to Eurasia and its soul. One could argue that Hungary is the living Eurasian idea itself.

‘The history of Hungary has been characterized by a continuous tightrope walk between major powers’

This particular dual identity gave rise to the feeling of being alone: ‘During the process of self-realization, one of the most shocking experiences of the Hungarian nation was that of abandonment, the absence of kinship, and a sense of national solitude.’ It was a group experience reinforced by the linguistic cultural isolation and the harsh historical experiences that formed an integral part of Hungarian political thinking and identity.

Turbulent Path of War Experiences

The aftermath of WWI was particularly transformative for Hungary. As a consequence of the defeat in the war, the Treaty of Trianon in 1920 dramatically redrew Hungary’s borders, reducing its territory by approximately two-thirds and leaving significant Hungarian populations outside the new national boundaries. This further served to reinforce the distrust and vulnerability towards great powers and the feeling of ‘being on our own’.

Later, during WWII, Hungary found itself in an increasingly precarious geographical and political situation. Initially, Hungary attempted to stay out of the European conflict, but revisionist ambitions and the region’s shifting power dynamics gradually pushed the country toward an alliance with Nazi Germany. When German defeat became apparent, Hungary found itself unable to break free from this alliance system.

The Soviet Time and Its Enduring Consequences

After World War II, the Soviet occupation became another traumatic period in Hungarian history. Hungary was incorporated into the Eastern Bloc under Soviet influence, which led to the formation of a socialist government run by the Hungarian Socialist Workers’ Party (MSZMP), closely supervised from Moscow. Rampant political repression, social terror, economic constraints and restricted rights defined this age and therefore greatly shaped the national psyche.

The Hungarian Revolution of 1956 made clear the long-held need of the Hungarian people for independence, reform, and the recovery of their national identity. The bloody crushing of the revolution of the ‘lonely’ (left-behind) Hungarians generated a deep sense of grief and betrayal by the West, intensifying Hungarians’ will to oppose outside control and supporting the story of Hungary as a country of freedom fighters against repressive foreign forces.

‘Though closely managed under rigorous party supervision, this deliberate balancing act presented once again Hungary’s historical tendency to negotiate between great powers’

During the 1960s the idea of ‘goulash communism’ emerged—a somewhat more liberal version of state socialism within the Soviet Bloc that permitted some small economic reforms and relative openness to the West. Though closely managed under rigorous party supervision, this deliberate balancing act presented once again Hungary’s historical tendency to negotiate between great powers—however, this time in a very low-key way—while remaining somewhat self-sufficient.

Cultural Contexts — The Clash of Interpretative Frameworks

Modern Hungarian politics mirrors this difficult legacy. Though membership in the EU and NATO keeps the nation strongly tied to Western organizations, it often follows policies that diverge from Western consensus. This is obvious in many respects:

• In reaction to EU policy initiatives, especially related to national sovereignty;
• A practical attitude to international politics that occasionally runs counter to Western ideas;
• Precise calibration of NATO obligations to balance military responsibilities with national independence;
• Sustainment of vivid diplomatic and economic ties with non-Western powers declared autocratic.

These conflicts have their roots in very different interpretative systems that define how each side views international relations, sovereignty, territoriality and political legitimacy as much as in policy differences alone. Western allies often see Hungary’s behaviour in terms of democratic backsliding as well as departure from settled European standards. From the Hungarian point of view, these very activities reflect a reasonable application of national sovereignty and a sensible response to shifting global dynamics as well as hard-learned historical lessons regarding the need of preserving control over opportunities for movement in power politics.

Bridge Between Historical Legacy and Contemporary Politics

The composition of Hungary’s historical experience with its modern-day political stance has made the country a harbinger of a possible political change in the Western world. Once seen as an oddity within European politics, Hungary’s unique political philosophy has become a powerful model that appeals to political groups across the continent and beyond.

Internationally, the Hungarian government is getting more and more credit for its emphasis on pragmatic government methods. Although the country is still often the target of criticism from the EU or other left-wing, liberal, and in some cases, centre-right forces, the country’s political model—centred on national sovereignty, border security, traditional social values, anti-woke rhetoric, and the principles of an ideology-free economy—is gaining significant traction within Western political discourse.

A Vision for Renewal

Hungary’s geographical location in the Carpathian Basin still influences its strategic posture. The growing influence of Eurasia and its major powers is bolstering Hungary’s position as a bridge between East and West. The most recent defining geopolitical approach of the country, which adopts a strong Eurasian perspective, acknowledges that the next century is going to see a major change in world power dynamics.

‘Hungary’s unique historical background and geographic location make it a harbinger of fresh geopolitical guidelines, political standards and new norms’

Hungary’s proactive efforts to establish diplomatic and trade relations with numerous nations, particularly in Asia, including China, South Korea, Japan, India, Vietnam, the Organization of Turkic States or even Russia demonstrate a forward-looking approach. While it keeps Western institutional connections, this reorientation is a refined solution to developing worldwide conditions.

Fundamentally, Hungary’s unique historical background and geographic location make it a harbinger of fresh geopolitical guidelines, political standards and new norms. The country’s pragmatism in international relationships and capacity to preserve its strategic autonomy while still engaging with world bodies provide important inspiration for countries negotiating the challenges of modern global politics.

This shift from anomaly to front runner—from black sheep to a black swan—shows how much current political policies can be informed by long-learned historical lessons on defending national interests in a geographically sensitive zone. Hungary’s skill in juggling national sovereignty and overseas participation gives ideas that are more and more pertinent to the EU or other countries dealing with comparable issues as the worldwide political scene keeps changing.

Related articles: